Cement, aggregates and ready-mix
Findings

Cement, aggregates and ready-mix producer · 1 cement plant, 4 quarries, 6 batching plants · 310 employeesThis War Map shows how we turn an operational review into an implementation plan. The dates show a possible sequence; the scope and schedule of a real engagement are agreed with you.

Findings

Where work gets held up, who has to step in, and what it costs in this example.

Trucks parked at the gate

About 35 trucks a day wait at a weighbridge while the operator phones sales admin or credit. Each hold averages 38 minutes, and the morning queue at the cement plant reaches the public road.

Delivery notes that change after departure

About 12 notes a day are amended after the truck has left: wrong site, wrong product code, a load split across two orders. The nightly import rejects them and Sage X3 is corrected by hand.

Ready-mix changes on the day

19 of 44 concrete orders observed changed on the pour day. The dispatcher retypes each change into a batching PC and calls the drivers one by one.

Two people hold the flow

The weighbridge lead knows which haulier loads for which customer. The dispatch board lives in the dispatcher's Excel file. When either is away, the gate and the batching plants slow down.

Illustrative time allocation for 11 interview roles

Phone calls to unblock trucks and orders
27%
Re-keying and corrections
22%
Planning and dispatch
19%
Customer, plant and improvement work
18%
Checks and sign-offs
14%

These scenario percentages total 100%. They describe task categories for the 11 interview roles and are not extrapolated to all 310 employees.

49% of the observed time goes to phone calls and re-keying. Planning and dispatch take 19%, checks and sign-offs 14%. 18% is left for customers, plant performance and improvement work.

Key Insight: Some calls carry real judgment, such as a credit decision on a large customer. The recoverable share is the call that only happens because the weighbridge cannot see the order or the credit status.

SOP vs. Reality

Gate to delivery noteSOP: 6 steps → The Reality: 12 steps, 3 handoffs
The SOP
Truck arrives with order reference
Tare weighing
Loading
Gross weighing
Delivery note printed
Truck leaves
6 steps, linear
The Reality
12
Steps
3
Handoffs
38-min average hold when a call is needed
Cycle time
~320 trucks/day across 5 weighbridges
Volume

The weighing itself is automatic and takes a few minutes. The waiting comes from what the operator cannot see: the open order, the delivery site and the customer's credit status. 11% of trucks need a phone call before loading, and each of those holds averages 38 minutes.

The Gap
The order list is printed at 6:00. Orders entered later, or for a new site, are invisible at the gate.
Credit blocks set in Sage X3 never reach the weighbridge. The operator relies on a list Émilie exports each morning.
In the 6-month sample, 41 loads left over the customer's credit limit because the operator released the truck to clear the queue.
35 held trucks × 38 minutes = about 22 truck-hours of waiting a day, paid either in haulier waiting charges or in lost rotations for company trucks.
Site addresses and product codes are typed by hand on the ticket. These typing errors cause most of the amended notes.
Ready-mix order to pourSOP: 5 steps → The Reality: 11 steps, 4 handoffs
The SOP
Order taken
Delivery scheduled
Concrete batched
Delivered
Invoiced
5 steps, linear
The Reality
11
Steps
4
Handoffs
Same-day changes on 43% of orders
Cycle time
~44 orders, ~105 loads/day
Volume

Each concrete order is typed three times: in Sage X3, on the dispatch board and in the batching PC. On the observed day, 19 of 44 orders changed after 6:00. Every change goes through Julien by phone or WhatsApp, and the batching PC only knows what he types.

The Gap
19 of 44 orders changed on the observed day (43%): volume, start time or pump booking.
Changes arrive by phone, email and WhatsApp. None of them update the Sage X3 order, so invoicing works from the batch tickets.
Returned and leftover concrete is written on paper. In the sample, about 1.5% of volume came back, with no link made to late changes.
Haulier mixers have no GPS link. Julien phones them to find out where they are.
Delivery-note correctionSOP: 3 steps → The Reality: 8 steps, 3 handoffs
The SOP
Error reported
Note corrected
Invoice issued
3 steps, linear
The Reality
8
Steps
3
Handoffs
3.4 days from error to corrected invoice
Cycle time
~12 amended notes/day
Volume

Most corrections are small: a site address, a product code, a load split between two orders. Each one still needs the paper copy, a confirmation from the plant and a manual edit in Sage X3. The weighbridge keeps the original, so the two systems disagree until month end.

The Gap
240 amended notes traced over 6 months: on average 3.4 days from reported error to corrected invoice.
About 12 notes a day are amended. At roughly 15 minutes of staff time each, that is 15 person-hours a week.
Scenario: 3,000 amended notes a year at about €900 each, so roughly €2.7M of invoices sent later or disputed. This is a cash-timing exposure, not lost revenue.
No one records the cause of each correction, so the same typing errors repeat at the same weighbridges.
Crusher breakdown to restartSOP: 4 steps → The Reality: 9 steps, 3 handoffs
The SOP
Breakdown declared in GMAO
Work order issued
Repair
Work order closed
4 steps, linear
The Reality
9
Steps
3
Handoffs
4.5 h average stop on a primary crusher
Cycle time
~6 unplanned stops/month across 4 quarries
Volume

When a primary crusher stops, the quarry stops. The repair is fast when the technician knows the machine. The time goes on finding the last intervention and the right part, because the history sits in paper logbooks and a parts list kept by Thierry's team.

The Gap
GMAO holds the kiln's preventive plans, but most crusher breakdowns are entered days later and without a cause.
Technicians search paper logbooks for the last repair on the same machine.
Parts stock lives in an Excel list separate from GMAO and Sage X3. Twice in the sample, a part was ordered urgently while one sat in another quarry's store.
Without coded causes, repeat failures on the same conveyor or screen stay hidden.
Monthly quarry environmental reportSOP: 4 steps → The Reality: 10 steps, 4 data sources handoffs
The SOP
Collect monitoring data
Compile monthly report
Review and sign
File for the annual declaration
4 steps, linear
The Reality
10
Steps
4 data sources
Handoffs
3 days/month
Cycle time
4 quarries, monthly
Volume

Claire spends about three days a month gathering figures from weighbridge exports, laboratory PDFs and the blasting contractor. She signs the report and checks every value again by hand. Year-to-date extraction against the permitted maximum is only visible once a month.

The Gap
24 hours a month of collection and copying: 24 × 12 ÷ 52 = 5.5 hours a week.
Quarry 3 had reached 84% of its annual permitted tonnage by the end of August. The figure only appeared in the monthly report.
Lab results arrive as PDFs and emails, in a different format for each quarry.
The signed report is stored apart from its sources, so answering an inspector's question means rebuilding the trail.
Key Insight: The five sample comparisons show 100%, 120%, 166.7%, 125% and 150% more steps, respectively: (actual ÷ documented − 1) × 100. Some added steps are useful controls, such as the credit check. Others exist only because two systems do not exchange data.

Work that needs attention

GateHeld trucks: calls between weighbridge, sales admin and credit; 35 trucks/day × 8 min of staff time × 5 days23.3h
Sales adminAmended delivery notes re-keyed into Sage X3 after the nightly import rejects them; 12/day × 15 min15h
Ready-mixSame-day order changes retyped into batching PCs and relayed to drivers; 18/day × 10 min15h
AdminSigned paper delivery notes collected, scanned and matched to invoices10.5h
MaintenanceCrusher repair history and parts location rebuilt from logbooks and memory6h
EnvironmentMonthly quarry report: 24 hours/month; 24 × 12 ÷ 52 = 5.5 h/week5.5h
FinanceMorning credit list exported from Sage X3 to Excel and emailed to the five weighbridges5h
Gate6:00 queue of trucks on the departmental road outside the cement plantongoing
80.3 person-hours/week across 7 quantified rows; 1 unquantified risk80.3 h
Key Insight: Driver waiting time is kept out of this register: the 22 truck-hours a day of holds are a fleet and haulier cost, valued separately in the plan. The environmental row converts monthly hours to a weekly figure. Rows are scoped to avoid double counting, and time spent is not automatically recoverable.

Risk Register

Single point of failureCritical
Karim Benali, weighbridge lead
He knows which haulier loads for which customer, which sites take which product and when to call credit. None of it is written down. When he is off, holds at the cement plant gate get longer.
Single point of failureCritical
Julien Masson, ready-mix dispatch
The dispatch board is his Excel file, and drivers take changes from him by phone. Early-morning pours depend on him being reachable.
Credit exposureHigh
Credit blocks invisible at the gate
Sage X3 blocks never reach the weighbridge. In the 6-month sample, 41 loads left over limit. The release decision should stay with the credit controller, with the facts in front of her before the truck is loaded.
Working-capital timingHigh
Late and disputed invoices
Scenario: about €2.7M of annual invoices go out later or are disputed because of amended delivery notes. This is a cash-timing exposure, not lost revenue.
RegulatoryHigh
Permitted extraction tracked monthly
Quarry 3 was at 84% of its annual permitted tonnage by the end of August, and the figure was seen only at month end. Exceeding the prefectoral permit is a compliance breach, and Claire carries the sign-off.
SafetyHigh
Morning queue and drivers on foot
At the 6:00 opening the queue reaches the departmental road. Drivers walk across the yard to the weighbridge office to sort out paperwork. Fewer paperwork stops means fewer people on foot among loaders.
Asset reliabilityMedium
Crusher history on paper
About 6 unplanned crusher stops a month, averaging 4.5 hours on primary crushers. Causes are left uncoded, so repeat failures stay hidden.
Data integrityMedium
Sites under several names
The same construction site appears under different names and addresses in Sage X3, at the weighbridges and on the dispatch board. Each variant is another chance of a wrong note.
Next Chapter
Implementation plan

Strategy Session · 30 min

A real engagement is scoped in the Strategy Session and may begin with a War Map or a bounded Feasibility Sprint.

Request a Strategy Session