Food and beverage
Operational Reality

Sample War Map

Food and beverage War Map

Chilled ready-meal and salad producer · 2 plants in Brittany · 260 employees

Retailer penalties are accepted by default because the proof sits in four places. Quality holds live outside the ERP, and one lot takes 6 h 40 to trace.

A War Map is an operating map built from real cases and expert interviews. It shows where the business is fragile, what that costs, and what to fix first.

What you receive

  1. 01Operational Reality

    How the work really runs: people, systems, handoffs and exceptions.

  2. 02Findings

    What it costs: quantified problems, process gaps and key-person risks.

  3. 03Implementation plan

    What to fix first: prioritized systems, timeline and value drivers.

Request a Strategy Session

30 minutes. We recommend the right starting point.

Read the sampleSee all industry War Maps

Chilled ready-meal and salad producer · 2 plants in Brittany · 260 employeesThis War Map shows how we turn an operational review into an implementation plan. The dates show a possible sequence; the scope and schedule of a real engagement are agreed with you.

Operational Reality

This is what we deliver: a map of where the business is fragile, what it costs, what to automate first, and which systems should exist so leadership can stop carrying the operation by hand.

Illustrative five-week work plan, January 12 to February 13, 2026. Eleven interview roles across eight departments, both plants and seven systems. The final week is split into synthesis and handover.

Retailer penalties
€412K in 2025
9% contested; about a third of a reviewed sample was contestable
Mock recall
6 h 40
to trace one lot both ways, against an internal target of 4 hours
Write-offs
€1.1M in 2025
60% linked to promotion misses and late hold releases
11
Team members interviewed
across 8 departments
7
Systems accessed
2 broken links, 3 run by hand
17
Workflows documented
12 with manual exceptions
24
Friction points identified
7 classified as critical

Five-week sample timeline · six work blocks

One row per week. Open a week to see each working day.

  1. Week 1
    Jan 12 to Jan 16

    Orders, plan and quality

    Scope set on three retailer accounts. Order intake, planning, holds and penalties shadowed.

    People: Philippe Le Gall, Anne-Sophie Kerbrat, Julien Morvan, Nicolas Guého, Sandrine Le Bihan, Gaëlle Pérès, Karine Le Floch

    Daily detail · 5 days
    Jan 12
    Kickoff and scope

    Agreed the scope: retailer order to delivery, lot traceability, quality holds and penalties. Chose three national retailer accounts and both plants as the shadowing sample.

    Philippe Le Gall · CEO
    Sage X3Excel
    Jan 13
    Morning EDI order window

    Shadowed the 5:30 to 9:00 order window. 214 EDI orders arrived. 31 needed a manual edit in Sage X3: unknown article codes, promotion prices, store-specific pack sizes.

    Julien Morvan · Customer Service Manager
    EDISage X3Excel
    Jan 14
    Production plan build

    The weekly plan lives in a 14-tab Excel file. Promotion volumes arrive by email from the key account team. The plan was rebuilt twice that day when orders differed from forecast.

    Nicolas Guého · Supply Chain and Planning Manager
    ExcelSage X3Outlook
    Jan 15
    Lab results, holds and release

    Held lots are flagged in the QMS and stay available in Sage X3. Shipping works from a hold list printed at 7:00 and 14:00. Release is changed by hand in both systems.

    Sandrine Le Bihan · Quality Manager
    QMSSage X3
    Jan 16
    Logistics penalties

    Retailers invoiced €412K of logistics penalties in 2025 through four supplier portals, offset against payments. Karine contested 9%. Each dispute needs the order, its changes, the signed delivery note and the carrier arrival time.

    Gaëlle Pérès · CFO
    PortalsSage X3Excel
  2. Week 2
    Jan 19 to Jan 23

    Plant floor and compliance

    Mock recall timed, dock and label flows observed, promotions and complaints traced end to end.

    People: Sandrine Le Bihan, Thomas Pichon, Yannick Hamon, Camille Tanguy, Élodie Riou, Julien Morvan

    Daily detail · 5 days
    Jan 19
    Mock recall on one lot

    Traced a chicken salad lot. Upstream to raw material lots took 2 h 10. Downstream to warehouses and quantities took 4 h 30, because mixed pallets are built without a lot scan. Total 6 h 40.

    Sandrine Le Bihan · Quality Manager
    Sage X3QMSExcel
    Jan 20
    Dock shadow from 4:30

    Picking by remaining shelf life is checked by eye. Each retailer's minimum remaining-life rule is on a laminated sheet by the dock. Three loads were refused in December for short shelf life.

    Yannick Hamon · Shipping Manager
    Sage X3EDIExcel
    Jan 21
    Recipe, allergen and label change

    A supplier mustard change took 19 days to reach the label. Templates are edited in the label software with no link to the Sage X3 recipe. Five people approve by email.

    Camille Tanguy · Regulatory and Labelling Officer
    LabelsExcelOutlook
    Jan 22
    Promotion planning with retailers

    Promotions agreed 6 to 10 weeks ahead sit in Élodie's calendar file. Uplift is estimated by hand and never compared with actual sales afterwards.

    Élodie Riou · Key Account Manager
    ExcelOutlookEDI
    Jan 23
    Complaint file build

    About 45 consumer and retailer complaints a month. Each file needs the lot, production record and lab results. Average 2 h 15 per file, of which about 1 hour is searching.

    Julien Morvan · Customer Service Manager
    QMSOutlookSage X3
  3. Week 3
    Jan 26 to Jan 30

    Internal analysis

    Penalty sample, write-off causes and the lot data flow analysed against 2025 records.

    People: No interviews this week

    Daily detail · 5 days
    Jan 26
    Penalty sample review

    Checked 380 penalty lines from 2025 against orders, dispatch advices and receipts. 34% had evidence to contest: retailer order changes after cut-off counted as shortages, or late arrivals after the retailer moved the slot.

    PortalsSage X3EDI
    Jan 27
    Write-off root causes

    Matched 12 months of write-offs, €1.1M or 1.6% of revenue, to promotions and holds. 38% of the value was linked to promotion forecast misses and 22% to holds released too late.

    Sage X3Excel
    Jan 28
    Lot data flow map

    Followed the lot number from goods receipt to dispatch. Found 4 points where it is keyed again by hand and 1 where it is lost: mixed pallets.

    Sage X3QMSEDI
    Jan 29
    Time allocation study

    Coded shadowing notes and task logs for the 11 interview roles into five time categories.

    Jan 30
    Procedure vs practice

    Compared the documented IFS procedures with observed practice for 17 workflows. Separated necessary food-safety checks from re-keying.

  4. Week 4
    Feb 2 to Feb 6

    Opportunities and plan

    8 initiatives scored, night shift checked, value model and 16-week roadmap drafted.

    People: Thomas Pichon

    Daily detail · 5 days
    Feb 2
    Opportunity scoring

    Scored 8 initiatives across 3 departments on food-safety impact, value, complexity and dependencies.

    Feb 3
    Night shift check

    Checked findings against the night shift. Production declarations are keyed at the end of the shift, so lot stock is 6 to 8 hours late in Sage X3 every morning.

    Thomas Pichon · Production Manager Plant 2
    Sage X3QMS
    Feb 4
    Value model

    Built conservative and higher cases from 2025 penalties, write-offs and the hour register. Separated margin effects from released capacity.

    Feb 5
    Roadmap design

    Sequenced initiatives so that hold status reaches Sage X3 before recall tooling is built on it.

    Feb 6
    Internal QA

    Checked every figure against interview notes and source files.

  5. Week 5
    Feb 9 to Feb 11

    Synthesis

    Findings validated with department leads; two corrections made.

    People: Sandrine Le Bihan, Nicolas Guého, Karine Le Floch

    Daily detail · 3 days
    Feb 9
    Deliverable assembly

    Assembled the War Map in three chapters: operational reality, findings and implementation plan.

    Feb 10
    Validation with department leads

    Reviewed process maps and the hour register. Two corrections: the hold list is printed three times on Saturdays, and one retailer portal allows a bulk export.

    Sandrine Le Bihan · Quality Manager
    Feb 11
    Final QA

    Final check of numbers, dates and dependencies. Handover pack prepared.

  6. Week 5 · Handover
    Feb 12 to Feb 13

    Handover

    War Map delivered; first two initiatives and owners agreed.

    People: Philippe Le Gall, Gaëlle Pérès, Anne-Sophie Kerbrat

    Daily detail · 2 days
    Feb 12
    Pre-handover review

    Walked through findings and value ranges. Agreed that every penalty dispute and every hold release stays a named person's decision.

    Philippe Le Gall · CEO
    Feb 13
    War Map delivery

    Delivered the War Map and roadmap. Hold sync and EDI order repair chosen to start first, with Sandrine and Julien as owners.

    Philippe Le Gall · CEO

What We Heard

“

“The penalty shows up six weeks after the delivery. By then the signed delivery note is in a box at the plant and nobody remembers the truck.”

Karine Le Floch, Accounts Receivable Lead
“

“A lot on hold is blocked on my screen. In the warehouse it is blocked only if someone reads the printed list.”

Sandrine Le Bihan, Quality Manager
“

“I hear about a promotion when the first big order lands. Then I rebuild the plan at ten at night.”

Nicolas Guého, Supply Chain and Planning Manager
“

“The minimum shelf-life rules for each retailer are on the wall, laminated. Two of them changed last year.”

Yannick Hamon, Shipping Manager
“

“We pass our IFS audits. What I can't tell you is how long a real recall would take on a Saturday.”

Philippe Le Gall, CEO

Team Members Interviewed

PL
Philippe Le Gall
CEO · Executive
AK
Anne-Sophie Kerbrat
Industrial Director · Operations
GP
Gaëlle Pérès
CFO · Finance
NG
Nicolas Guého
Supply Chain and Planning Manager · Supply chain
SL
Sandrine Le Bihan
Quality Manager · Quality
CT
Camille Tanguy
Regulatory and Labelling Officer · Quality
JM
Julien Morvan
Customer Service Manager · Customer service
ÉR
Élodie Riou
Key Account Manager · Sales
TP
Thomas Pichon
Production Manager Plant 2 · Operations
KL
Karine Le Floch
Accounts Receivable Lead · Finance
YH
Yannick Hamon
Shipping Manager · Logistics

Systems Accessed

Sage X3ERP: sales, recipes, lots, invoicing
Manual
Action needed
Production declarations keyed at end of shift. Lot genealogy incomplete for mixed pallets. Hold status changed by hand.
EDI platformRetailer order exchange
Automatic
Orders import into Sage X3 and dispatch advices go out. Rejected lines and late order changes are handled by hand.
Quality tool (HACCP, lab, non-conformities)Quality management
Manual
Action needed
Lab results and holds recorded. No link to stock status in Sage X3.
ExcelPlanning and tracking layer
Manual
Action needed
Production plan, promotion calendar, shelf-life rules and penalty tracker.
Label design softwareLabel templates and printing
Broken
Action needed
Templates edited separately from recipes. Allergen data is typed again for every change.
Retailer supplier portalsService-rate reports and penalties
Broken
Action needed
Four portals, four formats. Downloaded by hand, often weeks late, never matched to orders.
Outlook and TeamsEmail and collaboration
Automatic
Promotion agreements, label approvals and complaint exchanges live in mailboxes.
Automatic
Manual
Broken
Next Chapter
Findings

Strategy Session · 30 min

A real engagement is scoped in the Strategy Session and may begin with a War Map or a bounded Feasibility Sprint.

Request a Strategy Session